Readings from home into a queue somebody works, labelled by how they were taken.
Patients on a monitoring programme send numbers from home — off a cuff, off a glucometer, typed into the Send a reading card on their portal link, or read off a watch — and those numbers are only useful if somebody looks at the ones that matter. A programme is a set of measurements and the numbers that make one worth a look; a reading that crosses one of those numbers becomes a line in a queue a nurse works, picks up, escalates to a named person, and closes with what was done. The thresholds are also the programme’s vocabulary: what it measures, spelled its way, in one unit each. A reading is recorded in that unit or refused — nothing is converted — and a measurement the programme has not asked for is refused rather than stored under a name no rule matches, so the flag cannot be defeated by a unit or a spelling. TWO THINGS THIS DOES NOT DO. It does not invent a threshold: the number that decides whether somebody is woken is the doctor’s decision, so none ship with the app, the field saying whose decision it is cannot be left blank, and a programme with no numbers takes no readings at all — which the screen tells you rather than showing an empty queue as safety. And it never lets a self-report look like a measurement: every reading carries how it was taken, the patient’s own link can only say “I measured this” or “my watch says”, and that label travels onto the alert, so a step count and a hospital vital can never be read as the same kind of fact.
What it does not do, by design. A listing with only benefits is an advertisement.
Read out of the code, not the brochure: each app below is here because one service queries the other’s tables. Install either side and the hand-over is already wired.
Tell us what you run and we will show you this app inside a practice shaped like yours — or answer the question the page above did not.